Sprache wählen 
Im Ruhestand | There seems to be some new scenerules active ?!? We were never | | contacted, asked about it or to sign anything, is this the way the scene | | works these days ? | | | | We added the word "WEB" in our rls name. All tracks are hq company | | downloads for radio stations. | | Converted into LAME 3.98.4 -V0. | | Source = http://www.radioexpress.com |
| Why an INT rls ? | | Suddenly after all those years, this kind of rlses are not accepted | | anymore. The new scene rules sucks big time. Look at our last nukes. | | Radio Express isn't a valid store anymore. It's true, Radio Express | | isn't a normal shop, it's a radio service, delivering promo's. You got | | to have a licence to have access, work for radio or be a registered | | prof. DJ. What happened to the scene lately ? The scene used to be the | | place to find all the latest promo's before they were in the stores. | | Isn't that allowed anymore ? We are now in 2011, record companies won't | | deliver promo cds anymore, it's all downloaded. And Radio Express is one | | of those places. So how can we tag this rls ? As a -PROMO_WEB- ? That | | option seems to be forgotten in the latest rules. We were never asked to | | discuss about those new scene rules, and we didn't sign them either | | (never asked). So we are left with one option, to release all our Radio | | Express and Radio Ventures stuff as an -INT-. We are not happy about | | this, makes us sad and frustrated, we used to do this for fun. But | | were's the fun lately ? | | A question we asked ourself: What about all those Promo Only CDs, | | MmsCanada, X-Mix, and so on... These are no ordinary webshops 2, same | | thing. Nuke them 2 now ? Have fun nukeboys, you are slowly killing the | | scene. Good work kids ! |
User 
█ The new rules make me fucking LOL. What kind of
█ douchebags actually made it and approved it? First of
█ all, I do not understand why as a proof is only
█ considered taken photo of the physical medium and
█ cover or booklet together in a single image? I am
█ always working hard and seriously when making
█ releases and I spent significant amount of time
█ scanning front, back, inlay and CD pictures last
█ night. Bang! Everything was nuked! That is
█ ridiculous! Hi-res scans are not enough? That is
█ fucking joke, isn't it? Another thing that bothers me
█ is tons of questionable -WEB- releases. Proof is not
█ necessary here? WTF? Look what is clearly happening
█ nowadays - people, experienced rippers are making
█ great releases, spending their precious time on
█ scanning awesome and printable covers are getting
█ massive fuck off from the nukers. On the other hand -
█ and we all know it is happening - losers go to some
█ Russian music forum, get links to some rapidshare,
█ download stuff, retag it and release it as -WEB-. No
█ proof, no cover, no nuke. Is this fair? I don't think
█ so! Also please note that even some good groups get
█ only WAV files from their suppliers and they have no
█ access to physical medium whatsoever. Isn't Lame
█ version (v3.98.4) and encoding settings (-V0) proof
█ enough? For me (and I believe for most of the people
█ with brain) it is. Shiny retail CD encoded with Lame
█ v3.98.4 is always more appreciated then stupid 320
█ kbit encoded -WEB- with all kinds of different Lame
█ versions and no proofs. Spend more time chasing this
█ crap rather then pissing me off. I am doing it with
█ love and for the friends... and you? You are killing
█ mp3 scene, so fuck you! Next time you nuke my stuff
█ with this stupid reason, I will send you detailed
█ picture of my grandmother's asshole, fucker!
█
█ ...Yes, her ass is hairy.
Es macht doch aber trotzdem einen Unterschied ob ich nun mit 224 VBR oder 320 VBR codiere.
Wer den Unterschied nicht hört, dem kann es ja egal sein.
Da muss ich dir ausnahmsweiße mal Recht geben, ich höre den Unterschied ebenfalls gerade wenn man über Kopfhörer sich die Sachen anhört haben die 320 kbps Versionen einen Film besseren Klang und verkratzen auch weniger etc.
#