xREL.v3

READNFO:
So the hate bandwagon is back on, with all these fictional claims that
our work is based on a p2p source. Let's clarify some points, our initial
release included two undesired directories that a 'smart' person managed
to spot. This led to the claims that our source is based on a p2p release
and maybe even utilizing a p2p crack. This person FAILED to spot
that our release included the game's full sound track while the p2p
version did not (Proof 1 and 2). He also failed to check the crack
itself and how it works (Proof 3), as the p2p crack crashes on
load/save functions (Proof 4) while ours works fine.
So how did these two directories end up in our first release? Grey Goo
had some custom checks. So we had to test several approaches in a testdir.
As soon as we were done with our crack, our tester
was notified that a p2p crack was available before ours. He checked it
out and found it non-working. Instead of packing a clean game dir, he
packed the test dir with the leftovers of the non-working p2p crack.
As that was pretty dumb, we repacked the release to deliver it in the
state we intended to bring it to you in the first place.
If the nukers would have checked a bit more, there would have been no
need for this nfo. But since the competition is full of hate instead
of acknowledging a fair win, you are reading this.
Proof pics :
Proof1 : http://i.imgur.com/aXHL3uA.png
Proof2 : http://i.imgur.com/SOhjZrq.png
Proof3 : http://i.imgur.com/UZqNHwY.png
Proof4 : http://i.imgur.com/321VZXK.png
This should clarify, that we as CODEX do not base our source/supply or
cracks on p2p - only morons do. Over and out!